If a person hunts, whether it's for sport or for food, it is considered socially acceptable. We can easily take the lives of another species (except endangered species) and have no repercussions. But when an animal kills a human, oh boy do we hear about it. Stories cover the news and it becomes a controversial issue, usually resulting in the death of the animal. I remember the news of the whale that killed its trainer, which happened this past February, and the amount of coverage that story got. Everyone was up in arms that the whale killed his trainer, but when a human goes out and kills some deer, rabbit, etc. no one has an issue. We focus more on ourselves as being the "superior" species.
This idea of superior species is also an interesting one. We have been discussing race in class, and how divided human beings themselves can be. How is it that we see ourselves as a superior species, when we have our own internal turmoil, separation, and disfunction. People think that humans have many different races, and in today's society, it isn't acceptable to discriminate between these 'races'. This being said, is it fair to treat animals any differently because they are a different 'race', or are we really the more superior species?
No comments:
Post a Comment